|

CDC Reports the Health-Related Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against
Women Exceeds $5.8 Billion Annually in the U.S.
WASHINGTON — The health-related costs of rape, physical assault, stalking
and homicide by intimate partners exceed $5.8 billion each year. Of this total,
nearly $4.1 billion are for direct medical and mental healthcare services and
productivity losses account for nearly $1.8 billion, according to a report by
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
"Violence against women harms more than its direct victim," Health and
Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson stated. "It also harms the
children, the abuser and the entire health of all our families and communities. For the health of our country, it is critical that we stop this cycle now."
CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding added, "Violent acts against women don’t
end with visits to the emergency room. They are a major public health problem
that we are committed to preventing. Intimate partner violence costs women and
their families a high-price financially, physically and emotionally. We must
continue to do all we can to prevent the pain, anguish and health problems that
result from intimate partner violence."
The report estimates the incidence, prevalence and healthrelated costs of
non-fatal and fatal intimate partner violence (IPV) against women. It also
identifies future research needs and highlights CDC priorities for IPV
prevention research. IPV is defined as violence committed by a spouse,
ex-spouse, current or former boyfriend or girlfriend.
"CDC is actively involved in ongoing efforts to prevent violence against
women," said Sue Binder, MD, director of the CDC Injury Center. "This report
provides information that is crucial in helping communities demonstrate the
impact violence against women has on society."
CDC researchers examined the data from the 1995 National Violence Against
Women Survey for the incidents of IPV, the costs, how healthcare was used, and
how much work-related time was lost for women who were assaulted by intimate
partners. This report reflects the most current and reliable data that is
available on IPV and its related health costs.
Because of the data limitations, the costs presented in the report likely
underestimate the economic burden of IPV in the United States. The report points
out that these cost figures are not comprehensive, excluding such important
costs as those related to the legal and justice systems. Therefore, the costs
should not be used for analyzing benefit-cost ratios for IPV prevention
programs. However, the report may be useful in calculating the health-related
cost savings from reducing IPV and associated injuries and for evaluating the
impact of IPV on specific sub-sectors of the economy, such as consumption of
medical resources.
To help reduce IPV, CDC is currently:
• Developing a guide to identify promising prevention programs and
interventions for batterers • Funding programs to support rape prevention and
education efforts in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and eight
territories, providing for education in communities about the extent of sexual
assault and the development of programs to prevent it.
• Funding 14 state domestic violence coalitions to develop and implement
community coordinated responses. This initiative coordinates services and
mobilizes communities to respond to and prevent domestic violence.
• Funding projects to help monitor and track intimate partner violence in
five states. The goal is to help reduce IPV through the collection of timely and
credible data that are useful for planning, implementing and evaluating
prevention programs.
For more information on intimate partner violence, visit the CDC’s Web site
at: http://www.cdc.gov/injury
DateBook
SEPTEMBER 2003
3-5 Crime Scene
Analysis/Reconstruction
University
of North Texas, Denton, Texas
Contact: Edward Hueske, (940) 565-4988
4-7
Forensic Medical Investigation - A
Comprehensive Review
Hyatt Regency
Wichita, Wichita, Kan.
Contact: CClifton@C2andCo.com
www.C2andCo.com
6-10
Medicolegal Death Investigator Training
Course
Saint Louis University
School of Medicine, Division of Forensic Pathology and will be
Contact Mary Fran
Ernst, (314) 268-5970
http://medschool.slu.edu/masters
10-14
Annual New England Seminar in Forensic
Sciences
Colby College, Waterville,
Maine
(207) 872-3386
www.colby.edu/spec.prog/cme.htm
29-Oct.
2 International Symposium on Human
Identification
Pointe Hilton
Tapatio Cliffs Resort, Phoenix
Contact: Mary McCarthy, (608) 298-4651
OCTOBER 2003
1-3 Custody and Caring:
International Conference on the Nurse’s Role in the Criminal Justice System
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Contact: (306) 966-8360
www.usask.ca/nursing/cne/
13-17
Advanced Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
Course
University of North Texas,
Denton, Texas
Contact: Edward Hueske, (940) 565-4988
20-24
Society of Forensic Toxicologists
annual meeting
Doubletree
Hotel-Lloyd Center, Portland, Ore.
Contact: Kent G. Johnson, (503) 413-2069
www.soft-tox.org
23-25
Association for Crime Scene
Reconstruction annual workshop and training conference
The
Westin, Oklahoma City, Okla.
Contact: Tim Bevel, (405) 447-4469
www.acsr.org
California Forensic Nurse Captures Prestigious AAFS Award

AAFS award winner Sharon Crowley (center) is pictured
with supporters and fellow forensic nurses (from left) Catherine Dougherty,
Mary Sullivan, Barbara Spence-O’Donnell and Janet Barber at the annual AAFS
meeting in Chicago in February. Photo by Danny Scalf. |
Forensic nurse Sharon Crowley, RN, MN, was honored in February by the American
Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) as winner of the prestigious General Section
Achievement Award.
Crowley is the public health nurse and STD coordinator for the Disease
Control Unit of the Santa Cruz, Calif. department of health, as well as the
pediatric SART examiner/FCNS for Santa Clara Valley Medical Center’s Center
for Child Protection in San Jose, Calif. She has years of experience in
medical-legal examinations of adult and child sexual assault, child physical
abuse, suspect examinations, elder abuse and rape-homicide victims.
Crowley, a clinical nurse specialist, is the author of Sexual
Assault: the Medical- Legal Examination.
She also is a fellow of the AAFS and a founding member of the International
Association of Forensic Nurses (IAFN).
Victims of Child Abuse May Suffer from Hidden Head Injuries
PHILADELPHIA — Abused children may have hidden head injuries that go
undetected by routine examination and screening, according to new research from
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The researchers recommend that
healthcare personnel perform brain scans to screen for occult (hidden) head
injuries in children with suspected abuse injuries who are less than 6 months of
age or who present with high-risk injuries, including rib fractures, multiple
skeletal fractures or facial injuries.
The research team found that children with suspected high-risk child abuse
injuries had a high incidence of occult head injuries, even when their
neurological examinations were otherwise normal. Those head injuries, such as
scalp swelling, skull fractures and more serious intracranial injuries, were
often missed by routine physical, neurological and ophthalmologic exams and
skeletal surveys but were detected by brain scans, which are not universally
used for screening in this highrisk population. The study, published in the June
issue of Pediatrics,
was the first to estimate the prevalence of occult head injury in a high-risk
cohort of abused children.
"Head injury is the leading cause of death among abused children under age
two years," says David M. Rubin, MD, MSCE, a physician at Safe Place: The
Center for Child Protection and Health at The Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia, and lead author of the study.
"Because asymptomatic head injury can be difficult to diagnose, especially
in young children, it is necessary to use additional measures to determine which
children have sustained these injuries so we can intervene early to prevent
death, long-term neurological damage or future abuse," Rubin adds.
Children’s Hospital researchers studied hospital records for 51 children
under age 2 who presented with suspected abuse injuries between 1998 and 2001.
Patients were included if they had one of the following "high-risk"
characteristics or injuries: age less than 6 months for any abusive injury, rib
fractures, more than one fracture of any type, or facial injury. The children
underwent routine screening measures and a brain scan using computed tomography
(CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology. Also, patients included in
the study had normal neurological examination on admission and showed no overt
signs of head injuries.
Of the 51 patient records with complete data, 19 (37 percent) showed signs of
occult head injuries with more than half suffering from intracranial injuries.
Skeletal survey alone missed 5 of the 19 children with an occult head injury. An
ophthalmologic examination was performed on 14 patients to determine the
presence of retinal hemorrhages, a sign of head trauma. No evidence of
hemorrhage was present in any of the children, suggesting ophthalmologic exam is
not an accurate screening measure for occult head injury in asymptomatic
children. Children with head injury were also found to be younger than children without
head injury, with all but one of the headinjured children less than one year of
age.
The study results support a recommendation for universal CT or MRI screening
in all children under 6 months of age with any signs of abuse and children under
one year of age with high-risk injuries, including rib fractures, multiple
fractures and facial injuries. "Additional research is also needed to help
determine the presence of occult head injury in the broader population of
children who are abused, and whether universal or targeted screening would be
most appropriate," adds Cindy W. Christian, MD, medical director of Safe Place
and coauthor of the study.
Off the Bookshelf
Mute Witnesses: Trace Evidence Analysis
Edited by Max M. Houck
Academic Press, 2001
The spirit of this thin yet ambitious and information-packed text is captured
in the introduction, where editor Max M. Houck and British forensic scientist
Ken Wiggins write, "While our discipline has obviously caught the public’s
imagination, we still struggle to convince detectives, attorneys and juries of
the value of trace evidence. Often characterized as "could have" evidence
that only weakly associates the suspect, victim and crime scene, trace evidence is so
much more. DNA, despite the public and professional accolades, only answers the question ‘Who?’
Trace evidence may be able to tell you ‘what, where, how and when.’" The authors,
representing many disciplines of forensic science and law enforcement, do much to demonstrate the breadth
and depth of trace evidence in criminal investigations. The numerous case studies illustrate the
fascinating techniques and technology employed to turn up the often-microscopic mute witnesses that
speak volumes.
More News
|